Sunday, November 30, 2008

26/11: How India is losing its fight against terror
There were 10 of them. Or so the reports say. But the terrorist captured during action thinks he came with 14 others. Right there begins the tragedy. We don’t really know how many of those bloodthirsty bastards were ravaging through the heart of India. Even most of those terrorists who were gunned down could have escaped if they really wanted. Posing as a guest of the hotel wouldn’t have been that difficult, considering the fact that the police were not exactly verifying the people coming out were really guests. But they didn’t want to escape. Though the headlines screamed of ‘hostage drama’, I think the terrorists were NOT interested in taking hostages. They just killed anybody who came across them. Had they been interested in creating a hostage crisis, the outcome might have been very different. Like what happened in Kandahar in 1999, we would have ended up releasing some other imprisoned ultra and he may go on to establish yet another terror outfit. India is known for its diversity; it even holds for terrorism. We have ULFA terrorists, naxalites and saffron terror outfits in addition to a multitude of Islamic terror outfits.

Now, on the 26th of November 2008, a group of terrorists reportedly came from the Pakistani city of Karachi via sea route to some seaside town in Gujarat. They abducted a boat from there, and proceeded towards Mumbai. They killed the 2 men in the boat just before reaching Mumbai. Then they boarded a dinghy, and landed in the Mumbai soil. What followed is the darkest episode in the history of India. India was defeated in a war, had its prime leaders executed more once, saw scandals in deals of coffins for dead soldiers, witnessed its citizens engaging in inhumane gory riots. But nevereverever this happened previously: a group of foreigners in Indian soil held the whole country under siege. We had NO information, NO preventive measures, NO security measures and NO crisis management mechanism. To add to this we had NO proper guns, NO trained personnel, NO ‘useful’ bullet-proof vests and helmets readily available. We had to wait till the National Security Guards arrival from New Delhi. The number of personnel of the Marine Commandos was very less and the army was unequipped to counter a situation like this. Where is our gigantic defence budget ranging to tens of thousands of crores of Rupees utilised?

We can’t complain about the crisis taking so long to end. The situation was delicate, and the commandos couldn’t take too much risk because even the number of terrorists and more importantly the number of people trapped in the besieged buildings were UNKNOWN. We have seen hostage crises in countries with ‘more elite’ forces including Israel dragging through days. We Indians were not used to the prolonged standoffs; probably the reason behind the media starting to wonder whether even the most elite forces of the country were INADEQUATE. To add to this the terrorists holed up in Mumbai’s landmark buildings were highly motivated, skilled, intelligent and informed. They knew the blueprint of the buildings, especially the Taj Mahal hotel by heart. My friend from Mumbai on the second day of the siege called them ‘tiger cubs’ and jokingly suggested that some of them should be roped in to train our forces. As time passed it ceased to be a joke. By every passing second they were winning. They did maximum damage to lives, buildings and to the confidence of and on India. When the situation proceeded, they seemed to be in full control. I painfully realised that we had lost this time, yet again.

I saw Shobhaa De, a well known columnist saying she wants to see ‘heads roll’. I thought, well, she has been seeing that literally in the past few days. And as I write, I am seeing heads starting to roll, starting with the home minister Shivraj Patil. Patil was heavily criticized every time India came under attack from terrorists, but this time his party decided enough is enough. Everybody was angry against politicians. It’s always easy to blame. Changing heads of state is not a solution. We don’t want new governments doing the same old things. We want to strengthen our internal security. Next time some motherfucker decides to have a go in India, we need a response team readily available. We can’t expect the Intelligence to bring in a fully compiled list of future terrorist strikes. Even the world’s biggest and most sophisticated spy agency, the CIA failed to collect proper info about the 9/11. Intelligence might give leads, and we should not neglect them. Even now, there are reports that the IB had warned the government regarding terrorism through sea route. Even if the IB fails to get info, we should be ready for the worst, all time. We need SWAT like elite forces in all state police departments. And we need them ready.

Soon enough the gore will be washed away, there will be merry again. But we should not forget. In 60 hours, 195 people were massacred, including 42 security personnel. This year over 2000 people were killed in terrorist violence all over the country. We shall never forget. We shall not lose another time.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

DOSTANA: Has homosexuality become the in-thing in India?

The first attempt from Indian cinema at a sympathetic outlook towards gays. The Mira Nair film Fire was perhaps the first Indian film to deal with homosexuality, though the lesbian couple featured were married to men and probably were bisexual. Homosexuals being forced to suppress their nature and get married 'straight' is not a rarity in India. Anyways I can't say much about Fire as I am yet to watch it. Karan Johar brought in the cocept of gays to popular cinema with the Shah Rukh - Saif 'couple' in Kal Ho Na Ho. Going the tongue-in-cheek way and being slapstick at times, the scenes were meant to be funny only and nothing else. Most of the depictions of gays in the subsequent films like Masti were mere rework of the original Kal Ho Na Ho idea. Films like Life in a Metro and Honeymoon Travels Pvt. Ltd. did feature real gays, but the films had them as 'closeted': having straight life and having to 'cheat' to satisfy their you-know-what. Those two being what is called as multiplex films, Dostana is the first popular Indian cinema to orient predominantly on homosexuality, though the major cast only poses as gays to get an apartment for rent! This Karan Johan (The KHNH Connection!) produced film didn't do too much escapism which most other films flirted with. Even without the title characters played by Abhishek Bachchan and John Abraham being gays, the film throws a flash of light over the aspect of homosexuality in a very sympathetic way. This includes the female lead star's sentimental take on gay love to one of the 'gay' person's mom and depiction of a conservative mother who comes in terms with the fact that his son is a 'gay'! Kudos to the makers of the film for taking up such a risky subject and delivering an out and out entertainer with a message. And hats off to Abhishek and John for taking up the roles and even going upto the extreme of acting in an intended gay kiss scene! Homosexuality is certainly the in-thing in Indian cinema, but it might no be so about the Indian soceity.
The success of the film might not immediately raise demand for gay rights in the country, but it is a good start. I myself belong to the soceity which considers homosexualty as a taboo and like many others me too feel awkward while watching a gay kiss scene in films. The estimated number of gays in India is around 2.5 million and proper number of lesbians is unavaliable. Homosexuality is a crime in India with punishment upto life sentence. I am not sure if anybody was punished for being gays, though. Most of homosexuals in India live a 'closeted' life fearing the soceity's wrath. Compared to homosexuals, transsexuals known popularly as hijras in India are more apparent, but generally they too live a life away from the main course of the soceity. Its high time we Indians understand that homosexulaity and transsexuality are natural phenomena or say the act of the naughty God.
WTF is Hindu Terrorosm?

This is a not-so-publicised photo of an alleged Bajrang Dal training camp. Now after the Nanded and Malegaon blasts we are hearing the term "Hindu Terror" more and more. Extremist Hindu bodies were part of India even before its birth, but they were not associated with the word terrorism until recently. Now, after the Malegaon blasts targetting muslim areas, the Mumbai ATS has rounded up on various Hindu oufits. One on the Nanded blast accused reportedly said during narco test "We will be treated like hijras if we don't take action. Counter-attacks are the only way of avenging terror attacks". That reminds me of 'a wednesday'. That also reminds me of America's so-called War on Terror.

"An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind" - Mahatma Gandhi.

Amen!

Sunday, September 07, 2008

iPhone in India
7 months after its worldwide release, the most celebrated gizmo of recent times made its official debut in India on 22 August 2008. The hype it created in India was nowhere near what we saw in the US. Reasons are pretty obvious. Indians are not quite used to the idea of network-locked phones. iPhone is brought to India by Airtel and Vodafone, which are India's biggest mobile network operators. Despite that, Indians are more comfortable with buying a phone from a phone outlet than a network operator's outlet. If at all they decide to try that out they will soon find themselves with a much lighter wallet. The iPhone3G is priced at Rs.31000 (starting from) i.e. around $750, and the non-3G version is not released in India. It’s pretty odd that in a country with no 3G network, people are forced to buy a 3G phone. It should be noted that the same iPhone3G prices are startung from $199 in the US. That would perhaps make iPhone the only thing on earth that costs cheaper in the US compared to the price in India. As if these all were not enough, the iPhone comes with a 'technical glitch' from an Indian's perspective. It seems that Apple Inc has a little bit more respect for intellectual property than the Indians. The transfer of files from an iPhone to other non-i phones is not possible. Or at least that’s what my friend with an iPhone says.
Having said all this, the iPhone remains a first-class gizmo for the upper class and middle class kids who think they are the upper class. In a country with ever-increasing number of high earning professionals who make lots of calls and like music, the iPhone do have a space.